Shipping part (left) vs. FCC part (right)

iFixit did a teardown of the 3G iPad and found that it is mostly the same as the FCC submission Apple provided a month ago.  The only difference is that Apple has unlabeled some of the Infineon chips in the 3G module as you can see in the image above.
Some additional remarks from iFixit:
  1. The immediate visible difference is the inclusion of a black plastic RF window on top of the iPad for better antenna reception.
  2. The black RF window significantly changes the opening procedure. You cannot start separating the display using the notches on the top (à la Wi-Fi version), since that will undoubtedly break the RF window. You have to start from the right side and gingerly proceed to the top and bottom of the iPad.
  3. There are actually FIVE antennas in this iPad: Two antennas handle the cell reception — one is in the RF window on top, the other attaches to the LCD frame. A single GPS antenna is also housed in the RF window on top. Just like the iPad Wi-Fi, there are two antennas that handle Wi-Fi / Bluetooth connectivity, one in the Apple logo and another to the left of the dock connector.
  4. You heard that right, folks: Apple looks to be using the entire LCD frame as an antenna!
  5. Who would've thought: Apple uses the same 3G baseband processor in both the iPhone 3GS and the iPad 3G.
  6. The baseband processor in question is the Infineon 337S3754 PMB 8878 X-Gold IC. It was actually white-labeled on the production unit, but with enough sleuthing we were able to confirm its true identity.
  7. The iPad 3G has a Broadcom BCM4750UBG Single-Chip AGPS Solution, whereas the iPhone 3GS uses an Infineon Hammerhead II package. Big win for Broadcom!
  8. Apple did not change any major suppliers between manufacturing the pre-production unit they provided the FCC and their final production run.

If you like this post, share it ! | Post views: